Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How England managed to eradicate corruption from politics ?

0
0 Posted

How England managed to eradicate corruption from politics ?

0
0

We have lies corruption, false promises, fiddling, and they don’t even get the sack, we need to throw the lot out and start fresh as they are all as bad as each other, they run each other down and then do the same, so you cant even say they don’t know what is right or wrong.

0

Enough knowledge and funding to implement a public service system that promotes transparency and accountability. A quality education system, accessable health, water, sanitation, law and justice that works and welfare – these all remove some of the reasons corruption happens. Enough people that get the quality of life they need and it will be supported by ethical behaviour by the majority. Sure corruption will occur, but the critical mass can control it. It’s all about the economy!!

0
10

British politics is extremely corrupt. However, politicians are fairly accountable because the media is so antagonistic towards them, so they usually get found out in the end.

0

I think corruption was almost eradicated by the end of the 19th century in the Civil Service due to high pay 9in comparison with industry and pensions almost non-existent in industry) but i do not think it was only ever more or less contained in government. I seem to notice that this was being edged away as government powers increased giving more opportunity to the extent that every time I hear of judicial enquiry or scientific investigation on behalf of the government I ask how wide or narrow the terms of reference are. The crunch for me came in the Hutton enquiry when witnesses were not obliged to give evidence on oath. This meant Government witnesses could and did lie to their hearts content with no possibility of any consequences. On the contrary one person at least was promoted.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123