Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does the Wescott/Hort, Nestle/Aland differ from Textus Receptus?

0
Posted

How does the Wescott/Hort, Nestle/Aland differ from Textus Receptus?

0

These two Greek New Testaments are vastly different from one another. They are different to the point that only one of them can be the Word of God. If a person believes that Wescott/Hort is the correct version then they must believe that the Textus Receptus was added to (with words like ‘Jesus’ and ‘Fasting’ and versus like 1 John 5:7). If a person holds to the Textus Receptus that person must believe that the Wescott/Hort version has deletions. The Wescott/Hort, and Nestle/Aland are primarily based upon Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. These are in contradiction one with the other in over 3,000 places in the Gospels alone! The Wescott/Hort – Nestle/Aland Greek Text differs from the Textus Receptus in over 5,600 places, involving almost 10,000 Greek words – there’s no way that a Bible translated from the Wescott/Hort – Nestle/Aland could be anything equal to the King James Bible which is based on the Textus Receptus. The Textus Receptus was the Bible of early Eastern Christianity. Later it wa

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123