How does the “method decision chart” approach compare with the “performance criteria” used in the past to judge the acceptability of a method?
The method decision chart provides a graphical way of comparing the observed errors with standards of performance, whereas the earlier performance criteria provided a mathematical comparison. Therefore, the method decision chart is easier to use. In addition, the method decision chart permits simultaneous assessment against the different definitions of allowable total error, such as bias + 2s, bias +3s, and bias + 4s, which have evolved since the original description of “performance criteria.
Related Questions
- How does the method of TestWeaver compare with model-checking and other formal verification methods (e.g. as used by EmbeddedValidator, SPIN and others)?
- How does the "method decision chart" approach compare with the "performance criteria" used in the past to judge the acceptability of a method?
- How does the cybershot T900 compare with past digital cameras that I’ve used?
