How does the JCP Risk Reassessment differ from the JCP Program Evaluation Reassessment (formerly Interim Review)?
The primary difference is that the Risk Reassessment is designed to serve as a risk to re-offend tool (that is, to provide a score/measure of a youths risk to offend, which provides a guideline for the appropriate level of supervision a youth may need), whereas the JCP Program Evaluation Reassessment was designed to evaluate the impact of services on the youths behavior.
Related Questions
- Im interested in the EMC Program, but would like someone to evaluate my transcript and/or review my courses. How do I go about requesting a transcript evaluation or academic counseling session?
- Do abstracts have to be research-based? Can I submit a literature review, a program description, or a program evaluation?
- How should the JCP Risk Reassessment be used?
