How does the creator of knowledge relate to the tacit knowledge of man? And how does the creator of knowledge relate to his/her own tacit knowledge?
This question is mainly of interest to the actors view. The analytical and the systems views have not directly made a point of the phenomenon “tacit knowledge,” i.e., the inner quality which we have problems to articulate but which is there just as a kind of master talent. The actors oriented creator of knowledge in searching in every possible way for the inner quality of those masterpieces he/she is facing. And at the same time, he/she takes pains to recreate this quality within him/herself in order to able to understand the masterpieces and bring the experience forward. He/she is listening to the “harmony” of the actors, follows their rhythms and tries to distil the essence of the quality of the whole thing. For the actors creator of knowledge it is necessary here to enter a dialogue with a reality that he/she identifies him/herself with at the same time, in order to emotionally, imaginative and qualitatively look for what is unique, what is “tacit knowledge”. And make this quality i
Related Questions
- How does the creator of knowledge relate to the tacit knowledge of man? And how does the creator of knowledge relate to his/her own tacit knowledge?
- Does Knowledge about Climate Change Relate to Risk Perceptions and Willingness to Sacrifice?
- How does the metaphor "nature as female" relate to how we construct knowledge about women?
