Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does the burden of proof differ between criminal and civil trials?

Civil criminal differ proof trials
0
Posted

How does the burden of proof differ between criminal and civil trials?

0

The difference between the burden of proof in a criminal and civil trial is substantial. In a criminal trial, it is ‘beyond a reasonable doubt,’ – about 98% guilty. In a civil trial, the burden of truth is usually called ‘a preponderance of the evidence,’ which means more than 50 percent. Another standard used in some civil trials is ‘clear and convincing,’ which means exactly 50 percent. So, very, very different burden, very different remedies; money versus incarceration.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123