How does the allocation of state funds to different places match up with various demographic factors?
2) CTED has various cognate activities, including: • Buildable Lands Program (assessment of development trends and needs, taking into account environmentally critical areas and infrastructure, in the land base of more than 100 different jurisdictions) • Growth management: statewide mapping of Urban Growth Areas, Long-term Natural Resource Lands, Rural Lands, Critical Areas (i.e., wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat, geologically hazardous areas, frequently flooded areas, and aquifer recharge areas), Industrial lands; other data about how the Growth Management Act is working and how local designations relate to watershed planning, shorelines, etc. • Tourism (incl., a website allowing links to info on various sites to visit) • Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (mapping of cultural resource sites, mostly confidential information) • Infrastructure study, also related to Growth Management (patterns of infrastructure need and capacity) • Housing: Projects statewide compared to
Related Questions
- Can a State award HPRP funds in an area that receives its own HPRP allocation, or is the State restricted to distributing funds in non-entitlement areas?
- Is there a way to separate funds from one award but for various projects? What if they’re in different Departments, Divisions, or even institutions?
- Are there factors that affect how I should evaluate osmolarity within different demographic groups?
