Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does Solidify compare to simulation-based technologies?

0
Posted

How does Solidify compare to simulation-based technologies?

0

With simulation based technologies, the designer sets up a set of testbenches, each consisting of a vector generation part and a set of self-checking tests. Additionally, the designer needs to use a coverage tool or set up coverage metrics inside the testbench to monitor the quality of the testbench as to how well it exercises the design. Testbenches take a long time to develop, are hard to maintain, take a long time to run, provide no correctness guarantees, are hard to analyze with respect to quality, and may miss difficult corner cases as they statistically cover a small portion of the state space of the design. The shortcomings will not improve much with faster simulation technologies. For example, assume the block under test has 200-inputs and 1000 flip-flops. Assume the current simulation technologies allow for simulating 230 vectors. Assume there is a simulation technology available which allows 260 vectors to be simulated over 50 cycles. The number of possible combinations of i

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123