Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does PROactive compare to other cardiovascular and diabetes trials, such as RECORD, VA-HIT, CARDS, HPS, CARE, 4S, TNT, and UKPDS?

0
Posted

How does PROactive compare to other cardiovascular and diabetes trials, such as RECORD, VA-HIT, CARDS, HPS, CARE, 4S, TNT, and UKPDS?

0

Kaplan-Meier estimates indicate that allocation of 1000 patients to pioglitazone would avoid 21 first myocardial infarctions, strokes, or deaths over 3 years. In other words, 48 patients would need to be treated for 3 years to avoid one first major cardiovascular event. Although several intervention trials using antihypertensive agents, lipid-modifying drugs (principally statins), glucose-lowering agents, or multifactorial intervention strategies have looked at macrovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, much of the data pertaining to patients with diabetes are post-hoc or, in some instances, predefined subgroup analyses from larger cohorts. This makes direct comparisons difficult and, in most cases, inappropriate. Comparison between the results of PROactive and previous outcomes studies is also complicated by differences in predefined endpoints, study population, study duration, concomitant medication use, and a range of other methodological issues.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123