Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does prior authorization differ from “pre-authorized” and “prospective review”?

0
Posted

How does prior authorization differ from “pre-authorized” and “prospective review”?

0

A. “Prospective review” requires the treating physician to make a request for authorization prior to providing treatment, and if the request was made orally to follow up with a written request within 72 hours. (8 CCR § 9792.6(n)) “Pre-authorization” and “prospective review” have the same meaning in the California workers’ compensation UR system. “Prior authorization” however, does not require a request for authorization to be made prior to providing the treatment in order to be assured that appropriate payment will be made to the treating physician.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123