How does Logical Decisions help build consensus?
Whatever the concern is, Logical Decisions lets you separate out the objective and subjective elements, and to combine these aspects to arrive at an overall outcome. Often you will find out the best alternative really is best over a lot of different subjective viewpoints. So that no matter how you feel about it, it is pretty clear that the way it goes is this way. I wonder if you could you use Logical Decisions to build consensus in public debate? You would hope that if you were having some sort of public participation meeting, or viewing a presentation that they were covering in this sort of logical way, so it is sort of an interactive process where you are trying to get an opinions out of the public and incorporate them into your analysis, or process. A lot of arguments happen in public meetings because one person is talking about subject A. “This project is great because of subject A.” Then the next person says it is bad because of subject B. Something like Logical Decisions could b
