Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does latent class cluster analysis compare with the traditional clustering procedures in SAS and SPSS?

0
Posted

How does latent class cluster analysis compare with the traditional clustering procedures in SAS and SPSS?

0

A. LC clustering is model-based in contrast to traditional approaches that are based on ad-hoc distance measures. The general probability model underlying LC clustering more readily accommodates reality by allowing for unequal variances in each cluster, use of variables with mixed scale types, and formal statistical procedures for determining the number of clusters, among many other improvements. For a detailed comparison showing how LC cluster outperforms SPSS K-means clustering and SAS FASTCLUS procedures, see Latent Class Modeling as a Probabilistic Extension of K-means Clustering. Q. How does Latent GOLDĀ® classify cases into latent classes. A. Cases are assigned to the latent class having the highest posterior membership probability. Covariates can be added to the model for improved description and prediction of the latent classes.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123