Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does JMS compare to peer-to-peer distributed computing?

April 26, 2017compare computing distributed JMS peer-to-peer

0

Posted

How does JMS compare to peer-to-peer distributed computing?

1 Answer

0

Posted

Location: http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=790 Created: Nov 10, 1999 Modified: 1999-11-24 19:35:01.711 Author: Jerry Smith (http://www.jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=9) The term peer-to-peer is used in a variety of ways in distributed and network computing. One usage, at the application level, is to describe a distributed application scenario in with each distributed component potentially interacts with every other distributed component and maintains a network reference (access) to each component (using any of several mechanisms to do so, for example, via Enterprise JavaBeans and EJB servers resident on each network host, via simple RMI-based communication among applications, and so on). With JMS, distributed components interact with the JMS broker via destinations (topics and queues), which then disseminates messages to the registered clients; thus, distributed components do not have to know (and manage) each others’ network locations. As for the JMS middleware, it can use (behin