Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does IRC compare to microcurrent electrocoagulation?

compare IRC Microcurrent
0
Posted

How does IRC compare to microcurrent electrocoagulation?

0

Dr. Mathis is experienced in doing both infrared coagulation (IRC) and microcurrent electrocoagulation for hemorrhoid disease. Microcurrent electrocoagulation requires much more actual treatment time than infrared coagulation, has more discomfort, costs more, and has not been shown to be more effective. With IRC, infrared light is applied for about 5-10 seconds; microcurrent electrocoagulation requires current application for six minutes or more. No anesthesia or other medications are necessary prior to, or during, Infrared Coagulation treatments. After IRC treatments, patients go right back to work.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123