Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does IGCC compare cost-wise to other resources?

0
Posted

How does IGCC compare cost-wise to other resources?

0

As an emerging technology, IGCC is more expensive to build than other power generation (except for nuclear power). Electricity from a new, conventional coal plant costs, on average, about 4 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh). Power from a new IGCC coal plant with full carbon capture and sequestration should cost 7.3-9.6 cents per kWh (factoring in the capture-related efficiency losses and sequestration expenses). Rail transport reliability is a serious concern. Track problems often delay coal deliveries today, especially from the Powder River Basin. Relying more heavily on coal would heighten the possibility of supply disruption-related rate spikes and of utilities turning to dirtier coal supplies. The Northwest rail system is already strained; adding additional rail capacity will be costly.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123