Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does AMPL compare to spreadsheet optimizers?

0
Posted

How does AMPL compare to spreadsheet optimizers?

0

The Excel, 1-2-3 and Quattro spreadsheet packages come with solvers for linear, nonlinear, and integer programming; they accept enhanced add-in solvers as well. Their principal advantage lies in allowing all aspects of optimization — including formulation, solution, and analysis of results — to be performed within the spreadsheet environment. In particular, variables and constraints can be defined directly in terms of ranges of spreadsheet cells. AMPL incorporates a far richer language than spreadsheet optimizers for describing optimization problems. As a result, AMPL is much more natural and reliable for developing and maintaining complex models. The difference is particularly pronounced when many model components have more than two dimensions (or more than two subscripts or indices, in AMPL terms). By avoiding much of the spreadsheet overhead, AMPL also generates model instances faster than spreadsheet optimizers. AMPL’s speed advantage is significant for a few thousand model compo

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123