How Do You Argue Against Evolution Of Eyesight?
• Point out that clearly evolution if it works is by failure of a previously successful part or system in genetic accidents called mutations. The fact that life in any form and the eye have highly interdependent, simultaneously successful systems may make evolution seem illogical or nonsensical. There are many well known genetic system “crashes” (failing to work as usual) like downs syndrome, Siamese twins, idiot savant… but there’s more to consider like spina bifida–birth defect with an open spinal column or protruding nerve meninges — and births without appendages or with stubs. Do these benefit the individual… but where are such obvious, but useful changes in the individual at those or nearby sites in the genetic codes… where is the occasional, super-ability (out of bounds in the positive direction)… • “Describe a strictly reactive system that is disintegrated and lacking intelligence that forms interdependent, successful systems inadvertently–call it evolution.” Evolutio
