Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How do the Regents explain UCs role in nuclear weapons research?

0
Posted

How do the Regents explain UCs role in nuclear weapons research?

0

There are 4 common arguments that youll hear from the UC’s president, public relations officers, Regents, lab directors, and others invested in weapons research: public service, national security, status and prestige, and historical momentum. The UC Office of the President claims that management of nuclear labs is a public service to the nation. However, the research and development of more weapons of mass destruction serve to intensify the fear and insecurity that people and countries have in this precarious world. The most innovative work being conducted is not only the most destructive but also classified, negating the concept of the labs as anything public. Furthermore, nuclear research does not fortify national security because nuclear weapons are not needed for security. The current nuclear arsenal of the United States consists of approximately 30,000 weapons. With the new research being permitted for mini-nukes and an earth penetrating weapon, the actual development of new arms

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123