Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How Do Scholars Differ On The Historical Usefulness And Reliability Of Personal Testimonies?

0
Posted

How Do Scholars Differ On The Historical Usefulness And Reliability Of Personal Testimonies?

0

13 pages in length. How have scholars differed on the historical usefulness and reliability of personal Holocaust testimonies? For the most part, response has been in favor of the authors, inasmuch as an abundance of cohesion with regard to details that one cannot realistically question such authenticity. However, there are but a handful of so-called scholars who contend that the Holocaust was nothing but a political hoax. The writer discusses varying opinions as they relate to the validity of personal Holocaust testimonies. Bibliography lists 5 sources.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123