Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How do reviewers evaluate independence?

Independence reviewers
0
Posted

How do reviewers evaluate independence?

0

Independence in research/creative activity is an important criterion for merit and promotion of Adjunct Professors. A candidate must show that he/she has established a productive research program at UC Davis, as opposed to simply a continuation of research associations with previous mentors/colleagues. The candidate must also show that he/she has a cohesive program of research, rather than a mere collection of unrelated papers. Although collaboration with colleagues is encouraged, reviewers will look to see if: • The candidate’s contribution to the body of work is distinct and is clearly associated with his/her name by other scientists; • The candidate is sole, first, or corresponding author on a significant number of the papers; • The candidate is the Principal Investigator (PI) on funding of a significant number of the projects in his/her program.

0

Independence in research/creative activity is an important criterion for merit and promotion. A candidate must show that he/she has established a productive research program at UC Davis, as opposed to simply a continuation of research associations with previous training programs or colleagues. The candidate must also show that he/she has a cohesive program of research, rather than a mere collection of unrelated papers.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123