How do I effectively communicate dynamic changes in data collection to my field staff? How do I organize the work effort to keep this from becoming chaotic?
Triad-based data collection programs can generate literally thousands of data points a day. A well-planned Triad field activity will leverage this data to produce a final characterization or remediation result that is more efficient and effective than the traditional alternative. A poorly-planned Triad field activity can become chaotic in response to information overload. In this situation, there is the opportunity for making incorrect decisions or for work slow downs, and much of the benefit of the Triad approach may be lost. Effective communication and organization are critical key elements of Triad work activities. The details will vary from site to site and activity to activity, but in general a well-planned Triad work effort will include at minimum a description of data to be generated, formats that are expected, how that data will flow, what QA/QC must be applied, how data will be organized and depicted, which decisions it will feed, and who has responsibility for data at each st
Related Questions
- If changes are made in the data collection instrument or procedures for Indicator 13 in States, do States need to edit the State Performance Plan?
- How will AEL&P communicate updates and changes directly to the public? How do you plan to field consumer questions directly?
- How best can we communicate changes (e.g. use of Student Self-service for updating bio/demo data) to current students?
