How can we say that free software development has a good cost distribution model?
Firstly, it costs nothing to obtain and use the software, since it is freely accessible and free to use. It is easy to achieve momentum and a large user group. Users will want new functionality. Some users will themselves contribute developments. Others will pay developers to implement the functionality they need. This generally means that time and money gravitate toward improvements that are wanted by the users. The development cost is distributed among those who want the improvements. Other typical costs we see in the big proprietary software houses are eliminated: Marketing, salary for programmers when they are not productive, profits to shareholders etc. Natural development with focus on the customer The makers of closed software tend to function as collectors of license fees. Providers of free software, on the other hand, get paid directly for the development they do and for the support they provide. They are often more customer and service oriented. The difference lies in coverin
Related Questions
- calling me and asking, "Is Enagic a good water ionization system, and why does it cost so much? ... the worlds largest water ionizer manufacturer and here ...
- Furthermore, is there a good pricing model that shows the average component cost model for an independant corrugator ?
- Am I good with Avast Free antivirus edition?
