Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How can we move ahead in health care without recognizing that just a few people are burdening everyone with enormous costs?

0
Posted

How can we move ahead in health care without recognizing that just a few people are burdening everyone with enormous costs?

0

A new book “At The Crossroads: The Future of Health Care in Vermont” by C. Hogan, D. Richter and T. Doran goes a long way to clarifying the conceptual confusion and pointing the way to meaningful reform. One of the authors’ central insights can be encapsulated in a number. They point out that about 70% of health care costs represent costs of infrastructure. By infrastructure, they mean the hospitals, clinics and personnel that are always available to us whether we are using them at a given moment or not. It is important to address the costs of pharmaceuticals and other supplies, but they only account for about 16 % of health care costs. Reforming the health care system means taking a look at how we finance the health infrastructure. The authors refer to this infrastructure as a “shared service.” It is a service we expect to be on call for us whenever we are in need. It so happens that about 10 % of Vermonters account for about 70% of health care spending. And yet it would be impossible

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123