How can JWs avoid the words ” false” and “prophecies” and then say that they are not false prophets?
The Governing Body realizes that Jesus would never have appointed an unfaithful or indiscreet false teacher or false prophet over any of his “earthly interests.” And therefore in order to uphold the lie that “the Society is God’s organization” (which they believe to be the truth), they have had to do something with Russell’s and Rutherford’s teachings and prophecies that were false. But how can they convince anyone (including themselves) that those men didn’t have any false teachings or prophecies when they had so many of them? Here is how they accomplish this seemingly impossible feat… Removing the Word “False” The 750 pages of the “Proclaimers” book has simply removed the word “false” in connection with anything the Society has ever taught no matter how false it was. In place of the word “false” such teachings have been referred to as “past truths”—thereby not only avoiding the word “false” but using the word “truth” in its place. The word “false” is reserved for all other religions
