Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How can a meaning be understood if it has only an arbitrary identifying code?

arbitrary code understood
0
10 Posted

How can a meaning be understood if it has only an arbitrary identifying code?

0

Users can understand PanLex’s meanings by inspecting the expressions for those meanings. For example, instead of reading a definition such as “a substance made from wood pulp, rags, straw, or other fibrous material, usually in thin sheets, used to bear writing or printing, for wrapping things, etc.”, people can look at expressions to which a meaning has been assigned, such as “paper” in an English, “бумага” in a Russian, or “ペーパー” in a Japanese variety. Users who consider it valuable to attach verbal definitions (or “glosses”) to meanings are able to do so. They can do this by giving expressions metadata that consist of such definitions. If an expression has only one meaning, such a metadatum can be considered a gloss in the variety for the meaning.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123