Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How big does a dimensional error in locating the dominant surface have to be to result in a 2% error in Rentable Area?

0
Posted

How big does a dimensional error in locating the dominant surface have to be to result in a 2% error in Rentable Area?

0

If you assume a square building 150 feet on a side (22,500 SF GMA per floor), a 9 dimensional error in locating the dominant surface on each side of the building will lead to a 2% error (450 SF) in the GMA of a floor. Since Rentable Area is less than GMA (varies based upon building design), the critical dimensional error would be less than 9, possibly around 8 for this example. Dimensional errors for smaller core elements have to be much larger to yield a 2% error in Rentable Area. A floor plan that is reproduced by copying or faxing can easily change scale by 1% to 2% each time it is copied or faxed.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123