Haven various resolutions, such as the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safetys Venice Resolution and European Parliaments 2009 resolution, indicated that EMF poses a health risk?
The International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS) is an informal advocacy group that is not affiliated with any established scientific society or governmental agency. Their conclusions were not reached after a comprehensive review of related literature, nor do they reflect the consensus of scientific opinion on this topic. The European Parliament resolution argues for actions to investigate EMF and mobile phones. Scientists did not prepare the report and it does not provide a review of the science to support their arguments. The resolution is contrary to the findings of the European Union (EU) scientific branch that monitors the literature. The project team’s position on EMF is based on the conclusions of scientific panels consisting of the world’s experts in the field. These views are endorsed by reputable scientific organizations. Return to Top • Isn’t it better to use the precautionary principle when it comes to the potential risks of EMF? Certainly the damage done by
Related Questions
- Haven various resolutions, such as the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safetys Venice Resolution and European Parliaments 2009 resolution, indicated that EMF poses a health risk?
- The European Parliament adopted a Resolution on the European Private Company at the beginning of February 2007. Why has nothing been done for almost half a year?
- What is the relationship/difference between the European Parliament and the European Commission?
