Have you encountered any negative sales tactics such as threats of license + violations regarding either the client/server or named user policy?
Two sites mentioned problems with negative sales tactics involving threats of contractual violations. One person mentioned the reverse (perhaps refreshing to Oracle Corp. employees): > No never from Oracle. > In fact it is more we who have threatened them. This sampling was too small to be truly representative, but large enough for inconsistent policies to show up. In a nutshell, users are confused and perceptions of policies, even on the same platform, are inconsistent. According to a friend, Larry Ellison acknowledged at the IOUW that policies are complex and documented in an “encyclopedia”. If you factor in changes to policy over time, it would not be surprising if sales reps are confused right along with their customers. My thanks to all who took the time to respond.
Related Questions
- After installing Windows XP service pack 2 on my FLEXLM License Server, I find that the client machines now cannot connect unless I disable the fire wall. How can I fix this?
- After installing Windows XP service pack 2 on my FLEXLM License Server, I find that the client machines now cannot connect unless I disable the fire wall. How can I fix this?
- Have you encountered any negative sales tactics such as threats of license + violations regarding either the client/server or named user policy?
- Why am I getting communication errors between the client and LM-X license server?
- How does the Sentinel client communicate with the Sentinel License Server?
- How does the Sentinel client communicate with the Sentinel License Server?
