Have seen UI automated testing failed in many projects, How TestWise be any different?
The observation is correct and we respect people who have the courage to express that out (many projects just buy expensive a testing tool, record a few tests, and tick ‘Automated Testing’ checkbox, period): • UI Test Automation Tools are Snake by Michael Feather” (2010-01-04) • “Automated testing through the GUI is intuitive, seductive, and almost always wrong!” by Uncle Bob, 2009-09-30 TestWise is different, we don’t have sales pitch like “buy our tool it is simple as ‘record-n-playback'”. GUI automated testing is known easy to break, TestWise provides various support for maintain and develop test scripts in an easy and efficient way. Automated testing gets hard if no commitment and collaboration from the whole team, but the benefits are great, far greater than the effort. “It is scary to think of software development without TestWise after using it” – user feedback Frustrations with other Testing Tools TestWise Complex and hard to learn Learn in minutes, check out ScreenCasts Comple
