Hang ’em with probability zero: Why does it not work?
) No 06/14, Discussion Papers in Economics from Department of Economics, University of Leicester Abstract: A celebrated result in the economics of crime, which we call the Becker proposition (BP), states that it is optimal to impose the severest possible punishment (to maintain effective deterrence) at the lowest possible probability (to economize on enforcement costs). Several other applications, some unrelated to the economics of crime, arise when an economic agent faces punishments/ rewards with very low probabilities. For instance, insurance against low probability events, principal-agent contracts that impose punitive fines, seat belt usage and the usage of mobile phones among drivers etc. However, the BP, and the other applications mentioned above, are at variance with the evidence. The BP has largely been considered within an expected utility framework (EU). We re-examine the BP under rank dependent expected utility (RDU) and prospect theory (PT). We find that the BP always hold
Related Questions
- When asked the probability that the sky will fall one student responded /0. What should we have told this 8th grade student about dividing by zero?
- If the probability of bursting of reactor is not zero, then will the double wall design remain intact and not permit the radiation to come out?
- Transfer students often ask about the triple zeros which appear on their course tabulation. What do these triple zeros mean?
