Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Given the interrelationship with the TPA, are there benefits from retaining the current Victorian cross-ownership provisions?

0
10 Posted

Given the interrelationship with the TPA, are there benefits from retaining the current Victorian cross-ownership provisions?

0
10

If the TPA-related exemptions to current Victorian cross-ownership restrictions did not exist, the issue would arise as to whether it would be desirable for the quantitative ownership restrictions to operate on a state basis or a national basis. This in turn raises two interrelated questions, which are: • whether the Trade Practices Act 1974 provides an appropriate safeguard for the pro-competitive structure of electricity supply industry or whether additional measures specific to the energy sector such as quantitative ownership restrictions should be contemplated • if the answer to the previous question is yes, then should those measures be introduced on a State-based or national basis? Turning to the second of these questions, the reason for the current Victorian cross-ownership rules rested on the fact that Victoria had implemented wide-ranging pro-competitive reforms for both the electricity and gas industries. As these reforms were not pursued to the same degree in other States, i

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123