Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Given the importance of the waterfront to the long-term future of Holland, why cant the whole power plant be moved to another location?

0
Posted

Given the importance of the waterfront to the long-term future of Holland, why cant the whole power plant be moved to another location?

0

There are many issues that must be considered when developing a new electric generation resource. The site that is chosen must have adequate access to water for cooling, fuel delivery capability, be near electrical transmission and be connected to roadways that would support bulk material and heavy equipment deliveries. Fortunately, the site where the existing James De Young Station is located meets all of these needs. In addition, the site is already developed so that we would not have to disturb a Greenfield site to construct the plant. There are some key distinctions that support a plant located at the current waterfront site. Because we receive our coal shipments by lake vessel, we not only help ensure the harbor maintains its commercial status, but we also avoid needing significant space for rail spurs and coal unloading equipment. Further, the current location allows for connections between the wastewater treatment plant for cooling water usage and bio-solids disposal as well as

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123