Given the fact that enrollment will be capped at 7100, is it not fiscally responsible to exercise the language in the student housing contract (re: freshman & sophomores required to Live On)?
That would be an option but in reality only a short term financial solution. While we can physically accommodate these two groups, it would take away our ability to offer singles as a desirable option for students. Our long-term goal through the Strategic Plan is to create a residential system where students, rather than being required to live with us, want to live with us because of value and experience we provide. Q: With the ambitious projects that were discussed in this week’s townhall meetings (May 2008), where is the focus on changing the culture of the workforce that is to operate these new neighborhoods? Without major cultural change, putting up new buildings or renovating old ones would lead to having a Hilton run by a trailer park staff. I believe in the Values and Mission Statement, but I hear a lot of other folks who think they can get things to stay the same if they hang around like dead weight, which seems to be an accepted practice in the past. A: While I might have to s
Related Questions
- Given the fact that enrollment will be capped at 7100, is it not fiscally responsible to exercise the language in the student housing contract (re: freshman & sophomores required to Live On)?
- Does the enrollment contract oblige the student to pay the entire program fee even if he/she decides to leave before taking all the courses?
- The language rules given in GURPS Basic Set give unrealistic results for high-IQ characters. Are there any better language rules for GURPS?
