Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Gee … if biomarker testing is so terrific, then why aren’t all anti-doping tests designed to look for biomarkers?

0
Posted

Gee … if biomarker testing is so terrific, then why aren’t all anti-doping tests designed to look for biomarkers?

0

Remember that a biomarker test measures the effect that the performance-enhancing drug has on the biomarker. It’s possible that the same effect might be produced by something other than the performance-enhancing drug. Q: Like my black-and-blue mark being caused by the car door. A: Yes. Going back to our example of blood doping, we said that a low reticulocyte count might be a biomarker for blood doping. But there are other things that might cause a low reticulocyte count: for example, getting sick, or moving from a high to a low altitude. There’s also a certain natural variation in most biomarkers. In order for the HGH test to be valid, the scientists have to find a biomarker measurement that they can confidently link to HGH use – and only to HGH use.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123