Game records should be sent and returned by email in SGF format. The request for review may include your own comments and questions such as “Should this extension have been on the 4th line instead?
• Please pick someone no more than 9 stones stronger than you. This rule of thumb will help distribute the reviewing load fairly. (Otherwise the high dans would get all the requests.) • The IGS ratings are normally used for the determination of the strength difference. People not having access to IGS will indicate their own strength but should take into account that IGS rating is stronger than the ranks used in most countries. For example a person of 1d AGA rank might be only 3k* on IGS, and a 15k AGA might be only 25k*. Since the IGS ratings are known to be very inaccurate in the 10k-30k range, the ratings determined by an alternative rating system are also given in the status file. You can use them to get a better approximation of the reviewers’ strengths. • Please try to spread the load among reviewers by not always asking the same reviewer. The status file indicates how many reviews have been made by each reviewer. Have a look and see who’s popular and select another reviewer. In a
Related Questions
- Game records should be sent and returned by email in SGF format. The request for review may include your own comments and questions such as "Should this extension have been on the 4th line instead?
- What are the possible determinations when a review request is sent to a physician peer reviewer?
- How can I change the format of notification or escalation reports sent by email?
