FSCAN FAQ: Why use square wave, positive DC offset rather than sine wave for Clark and Rife frequencies?
I’m getting a lot of email asking questions about the FSCAN which I mentioned in several previous postings. Since the same questions are coming from many different sources, I’m beginning to build an FSCAN Frequently Asked Questions document. A study of the Rife literature referenced in the rifers list (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rifers/) will indicate that Rife may have achieved positive results with the frequency devices he built because of harmonics in the transmission of radio frequency wave forms. Using square waves generates many harmonics which my tests indicate destroy parasites and other microorganisms more effectively than sine waves. In the case of positive offset of the waveform, Hulda Clark has observed that this inhibits microorganisms, whereas a sine wave which goes positive and negative may actually enhance the growth of some organisms. My tests indicate that positive offset is more effective so I always use it for both Clark and Rife frequencies. Rife frequencies, or
