For Scoring Policy #9, can a student write see above instead of using an arrow to indicate an explanation to be included for consideration?
Such an indication would be acceptable if the intent is completely clear, i.e., if there is no ambiguity as to what is to be included, and if that work is in the form of an explanation. Q26: For a Show Your Work question, why can a student receive 1 point for providing a correct response but not showing work while a student who provides a correct response but includes an incorrect method for achieving that response gets a 0? A: A student who provides a correct answer and no work is demonstrating that he or she may have some understanding of the underlying concepts, whereas the student who provides a correct answer which was arrived at by an obviously incorrect and completely irrelevant procedure has demonstrated that he or she does not understand the underlying concepts.
Related Questions
- Is voice still an important consideration in scoring student responses, or are the number of text details included in the response a more important factor?
- For Scoring Policy #9, can a student write see above instead of using an arrow to indicate an explanation to be included for consideration?
- With School Agreements, the staff work at home rights are included on version 3.4. Is this the same with the student home use option?
