for being wrong or inaccurate?
I wouldn’t say that the secondary publications are generally wrong and everything stated there should be doubted. Some inaccurate ship schematics in the Fact Files and silly technical specs in the DS9TM are no reason that these publications are flawed on the whole. On the contrary, they are mostly well-researched and should be on every fan’s bookshelf. Reading my site might create the impression that I find fault with everything, but that’s because I simply don’t want to reproduce their content, so I pick the errors and try to correct them. Concerning their reliability and plausibility there are differences between the publications, though. I would wish every reference manual were as well-crafted as the TNG Technical Manual.
Related Questions
- Various complaints have been received regarding wrong metering and inaccurate monthly estimates which consumers must pay or face being cut off. What is Erongo RED’s position on this?
- When trying to activate Windows XP, I receive the error "Product Key is not valid." Did Keyfinder retrieve the wrong key?
- for being wrong or inaccurate?
