Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Explain why a 2000 search found no records about DU, but a later records search did. Did the Army conceal the presence of DU in Hawaii because it is, or was, classified information?

0
Posted

Explain why a 2000 search found no records about DU, but a later records search did. Did the Army conceal the presence of DU in Hawaii because it is, or was, classified information?

0

The Army did not intentionally conceal its past use of DU in Hawaii. At the time, we made a good faith effort to determine the facts by searching local records from all Military Services in Hawaii. Our focus, however, was on modern kinetic munitions that contain DU penetrators. The Davy Crocket was a classified weapon system, that actually used munitions containing DU, and trained in Hawaii in the early 1960s. We had no contemporary experience with this weapon system. Until we discovered DU on a Schofield Barracks range during range clearance activities in 2005, we had no local knowledge that the M101 spotting round had been fired in Hawaii.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123