Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Error Correction – Can I use DMX512 for control in hazardous applications?

0
Posted

Error Correction – Can I use DMX512 for control in hazardous applications?

0

No. DMX512 does not have any inherent error detection. In fact, the ANSI version added language stating: “There is no assurance that all DMX512 packets will be delivered” and “Since this Standard does not mandate error checking, DMX512 is not an appropriate control protocol for hazardous applications.” Even with the data packet being refreshed constantly, there is no method for the receiver to determine that the information it received is information the transmitter (console) sent. One bad data packet, even if corrected in the next packet, can cause something to move or energize when it shouldn’t. DMX512–A does offer a standard method for sending a checksum which can be part of an error correction routine (Annex Clause D4), but this is an optional implementation and cannot be relied on.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123