Enhanced interrogation techniques, are they sometimes necessary?
This is so hilarious and simultaneously so sad and pathetic that people keep asking this question. It has been proven repeatedly that “enhanced interrogation” is ineffective and suspect for gathering actionable intelligence. They will tell you anything that they think will satisfy you and will stop the pain. Interrogation should only take place within scope of focused investigation otherwise, it will become “the blind leading the blind”. And please do not bring up the “ticking bomb” scenario. That is security theatre at the extreme and worst. Totally emotionally laden and without a clear perspective. Most people who watch fiction or have zero training/zero imagination in modern and effective interrogation suscribe to “enhanced interrogation” Causal behavior from watching “24” and like bogus fiction on television which echoed through many “interrogation” procedurals. Fiction becoming fact with basis in people who had no experience or effective training – hollywood writers – imaginative
Related Questions
- If all units are observed with the suggested enhanced visual inspection, and affected units removed, is leukoreduction necessary for units for which no suspect particulates are observed?
- Why is there such a debate over what constitutes torture or enhanced interrogation techniques?
- Why is an interview techniques course necessary?
