Dude, you make a huge deal out of Zombies that can Run in Dawn of the Dead (2004), but you had no issue with the same thing taking place in Return of the Living Dead (1985) which you loved! Whats the difference?
The difference is “why”! Return of the Living Dead (1985) was a comedy, a spoof that allowed for intelligent and clever zombies to build Pulley systems to get to their prey and for other zombies to use a radio to send for more cops and paramedics to eat. Dawn of the Dead (2004) purported to be a serious film yet they pick and choose between lumbering and slow Frankenstein Zombies, and Mercurial Bruce Jenner on White Crosses Zombies. It’s not consistent or believeable, which is great for a Farce, but Dawn of the Dead (2004) was not a farce. At least not intentionally so. • Do you accept solicitations for reviews? Actually, yes, I do. If you’re a filmmaker or a musician, or even a writer who has a piece of Media for me to review CLICK HERE to read how to submit and I’d be pleased to review your work and post contact information on my site for you (if mailing is required I’ll give you a mailing address if I trust the request)… however, this isn’t an Advertisement service! Just beause yo
Related Questions
- Dude, you make a huge deal out of Zombies that can Run in Dawn of the Dead (2004), but you had no issue with the same thing taking place in Return of the Living Dead (1985) which you loved! Whats the difference?
- Why have Israeli leaders been so unwilling or so unable to deal with the settlements issue?
- Is the GE-Honeywell (nyse: HON - news - people ) deal returning from the dead?
