Don all the government reviewers and negotiations over wording make the IPCC report a political, not a scientific, document?
The unique structure of the IPCC includes both scientific and governmental review, but the input of diplomats to the final report is designed to be distinct and different from that of scientists. Scientists who are experts in their subject matter prepare the chapters that go into the full assessment reports. Those chapters are scrutinized by individual scientists and scientist panels, whose questions must be addressed before a chapter can be approved for inclusion. The chapters making up the 2007 draft report from IPCC Working Group 1 report run to over 1,600 pages. It is only the Summary for Policymakers, typically around 30 pages, that receives a word-by-word review, during the final plenary session, by diplomats from almost every nation in the world. The lead authors of the report are on hand at the plenary to make sure that any changes are scientifically valid. The diplomats have a say in how the Summary for Policymakers is worded, but the scientists have the last word on what is s
Related Questions
- Don all the government reviewers and negotiations over wording make the IPCC report a political, not a scientific, document?
- Don all the government reviewers and negotiations over wording make the IPCC report political, not scientific?
- Don all the negotiations over specific wording make the IPCC report a political, not a scientific, document?
