Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does the standard require that the organization have one QMC or is it acceptable to have 2 committees, one that monitors operational performance and one that monitors clinical performance?

0
Posted

Does the standard require that the organization have one QMC or is it acceptable to have 2 committees, one that monitors operational performance and one that monitors clinical performance?

0

Response: Core 33 requires that a single quality management committee (QMC) has been granted authority for quality management by the organization’s governing body. That QMC may establish permanent or ad hoc sub-committees as needed to address various aspects of quality (i.e., operational, clinical, etc.), but URAC will look for one committee to be accountable to the governing body (e.g., Board of Directors or Senior Management Team, if the organization does not have a Board) for the overall quality management program. This accountability cannot be shared by two separate committees.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123