Does the “shape” (timing) of the fixed payments associated with an offer have any ramification in the evaluation?
The timing of the fixed payments has an impact on market value, customer rates, credit and performance risk, and viability. PG&E will consider all those impacts in its evaluation. 18) “Appendix E – Offer Data Forms (revised 12-22-04)”, states the following: “Peak July Conditions are based on the average of the monthly maximum daily peak temperatures of the preceding 10 years for the month of July as provided by the National Climatic Data Center (“NCDC”) at http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/servlets/ULCD. Data from the NCDC should be for a geographically nearby weather station that approximates the conditions at the specific plant site. Expected operating conditions are the average of the monthly temperature for the preceding 10 years.” Should the Peak July Temperature is to be calculated as the average of the maximum temperatures on the peak July day for the past 10 years (i.e., the average of 10 data points), or as the average of the maximum temperatures of all the July days for the past 10 ye
Related Questions
- Do you (MedEncentive) have plans to offer the special pricing associated with the grant to employers/insurers that do not participate in the evaluation?
- Does the "shape" (timing) of the fixed payments associated with an offer have any ramification in the evaluation?
- What is the difference between a Fixed Penalty and a Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty?
