Does the session framework require sticky load-balancing from the Load Balancer in the configuration for session failover?
Sticky load-balancing is not required for the session framework to function. Even if the session request is sent to the wrong server, the built-in routing logic in the framework would ensure that the request arrives at the correct server a process that’s completely transparent to the clients. Note, however, that lack of sticky load-balancing results in extra forwarding and impacts performance.
Related Questions
- In the configuration for session failover, whats the relationship among the policy agents, the Load Balancer, and the Access Manager servers behind Load Balancers?
- Does the session framework require sticky load-balancing from the Load Balancer in the configuration for session failover?
- Does the use of sticky load balancing prevent session failover ?
