Does the plan to forbid discrimination against dogs also include cats?
And does it include regulations on the practice of charging more monthly rent for having a dog/cat- in addition to the additional deposit? I understand the additional deposit (which should be regulated) but what do they need more monthly rent for? Garrison Keillor proposed a public option for pet health care a while back, “People love their animals, and if we could just agree that everybody in America should receive the same level of care enjoyed by an elderly golden retriever, we could be done with this and get ready for the World Series.” Stumble Upon currently records 1,251 views of “Prohibited Pets.” People sure do get worked up about their animals. To answer your first question, how could you exclude Mr. Mittens, here, from any proposal requiring pets? The answer is unequivocally no, any ordinance of this sort could not exclude cats. In fact under the rubric of the Americans with Disabilities Act, a companion animal can be almost anything. We’ve argued for and received reasonable
Related Questions
- No discrimination between hourly and salaried employees, does this mean no discrimination in plan design or a group covering only salaried and not hourly, or both?
- Is it possible to avoid discrimination testing by offering a cafeteria plan?
- Who can qualify to join a single employer plan? Is discrimination permitted?
