Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does the NIH proposal mandate a restructuring of the scholarly communication system?

0
Posted

Does the NIH proposal mandate a restructuring of the scholarly communication system?

0

The NIH proposal is neither a mandate from the federal government to the scientific community concerning how and where to publish research articles nor does this proposed policy mandate changes to scientific, technical, and medical (STM) publishing. The NIH proposal balances the public interest in access to federally funded research while maintaining the critical role of peer review and editorial processing by journal publishers. The NIH proposal is silent on where and when an author may publish. In fact, the proposal protects journal publishers by placing a six-month embargo on access to the deposited article. It does not mandate a shift from a subscriber-pays model to author-pays or other open access model. The NIH proposal is directed at enhancing public access to biomedical literature. It is not an open access proposal.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123