Does the KJV quote the Deuterocanonical books?
Hi, Robert, Years ago, I asked you whether I should write an article to prove that the Protestant rejection of the deuterocanon was logically inconsistent. You replied that wouldn’t be a good idea. Well, maybe you’re right. But something surprised me just now when I visited the “King James Version” page at http://www.CatholicApologetics.net. That site includes scanned the images of passages from the KJV’s 1625 edition. Beside each New Testament passage that quotes a deuterocanonical book, you’ll see marginalia showing the chapter and verse numbers of the deuterocanonical passages. If the images and the marginalia are genuine, KJV-onlyists have a problem. KJV-onlyists deny that the deuterocanon is canonical. But since some deuterocanonical passages appear in at least one edition of the KJV, the KJV-onlyists need to admit that some deuterocanonical passages are canonical, or that some editions of the KJV contain some errors. But what KJV-onlyist would do that? The KJV-onlyists contradict
