Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults?
To determine whether older adults find it difficult to inhibit the processing of irrelevant speech, the authors asked younger and older adults to listen to and repeat meaningless sentences (e.g., “A rose could paint a fish”) when the perceived location of the masker (speech or noise) but not the target was manipulated. Separating the perceived location (but not the physical location) of the masker from the target speech produced a much larger improvement in performance when the masker was informational (2 people talking) than when the masker was noise. However, the size of this effect was the same for younger and older adults, suggesting that cognitive-level interference from an irrelevant source was no worse for older adults than it was for younger adults. Copyright 2004 APA.
Related Questions
- Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults?
- What is the difference between learning a failure and learning a word after the recognition process?
- Are sardines a good source of omega-3? Does the canning process affect content?
